Becoming Headless

Secular Spirituality·February 23, 2024

After a meditation session, I go up to the mirror and stare at the reflection that effortlessly appears on its surface. I see a young man with a gruff beard, soft dark-brown eyes, somewhat messy hair, and a bland expression. I register these sights, but when I turn upon my real face, the point from which I am supposed to be experiencing everything, I learn that there is nothing to find except for the experience itself. Where my head was supposed to be there is only a void. Not literal nothingness, but a place of endless potential, giving expression to the moment and also one with it. A thought emerges, demanding the location of my body, and I find that I can only vaguely sense it, concealed as it is by the veil of vision.

A testimony of this nature, by virtue of being so unusual, is particularly susceptible to dismissal. To the sensible and pragmatic, it may appear to be nothing less than a symptom of psychosis or, worse still, a lie. I am not suggesting that I was literally decapitated, and yet was somehow not only alive but also able to see without the requisite organs. This anecdote demonstrates a shift in consciousness, when the clarity of experience cuts through the ceaseless flow of thought, and one is able to experience life as it truly is, without overlaying it with concepts. For concepts can never faithfully capture the field of experience. Experience is dynamic, ever-changing, and impossible to catch, while concepts are more or less static symbols that we rely on for a sense of security, a semblance of stability amid the constant flux of phenomena. That is why it is impossible to capture the experience of headlessness in the moment. It can only be put it into words after the fact.

This is not to say that we should abandon the faculties for speech and imagination, which allow us to accomplish so many wonderful things in life. In fact, it would be quite hypocritical of me to suggest that, since it is by relying on these very abilities that I am writing this. Problems arise when we confuse the symbols for experience for the actual experience. One such symbol that prominently features in our lives is the sense of self — it is almost as if we walk around carrying a homunculus inside our heads, a vulnerable "I" that is pushed around by the world and, in an effort to build itself up, attempts to force it into submission. Sure, one might get the impression of succeeding from time to time, but ultimately all such efforts are doomed, for they are based on a falsehood.

Once one is able to see through the nature of self — not just conceptually but by observing the tenuous conditions that give rise to it moment by moment — it becomes clear that there is nothing apart from sights, sounds, tastes, smells, thoughts, and feelings. Anything that might suggest that there is an observer in addition to experience is itself a part of that experience. This insight into the non-dual nature of mind is the basis of true freedom.

I learned about headlessness several years ago from a lovely little volume called On Having No Head, authored by the Zen contemplative Douglas Harding. There is also The Headless Way, a website where one can learn about techniques intended to induce such an experience and the insights that it is supposed to facilitate. The latter is important for without knowing what to look for, one might dismiss the headless experience as a mere party trick. That would be a grave error. I should also add that, although these insights are available to anyone anywhere, since we have become so accustomed to viewing the world from a conceptual lens, it helps to train concentration and achieve clarity through vipassana practice, or mindfulness meditation, before embarking on the quest to discover one's real face.

Ethical Considerations Regarding Meat-Eating

Philosophy·February 11, 2024

Much has been written about the horrors inflicted upon animals on factory farms. I won’t go into that here. If you want to learn about intensive animal farming practices, you can watch the documentary Dominion for free on Youtube or, better yet, read Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer.

The utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer has also been instrumental in the development of my views on animal ethics as well as morality in general. I even had the good fortune of conversing with him via email, which helped further refine my perspective.

What follows is an overview of the thoughts that led me to adopt a vegetarian diet:

  • Eating meat means supporting a system that is cruel to animals.
  • In Pakistan, where small-scale animal farming is more common than factory farming, farmed animals other than chickens might have lives worth living (i.e. the positive in their lives outweighs the negative), though I cannot say that with any certainty.
  • While small-scale operations are common in Pakistan, large-scale factory farming systems are emerging.
  • Under large-scale factory farming systems animals generally live miserable lives. There is no reason to believe that the case would be any different in Pakistan, especially considering that the Animal Protection Index has rated the country a poor performer (E) and has given it the worst performance rating (G) for farmed animal protection legislation.
  • Thus, it would be reasonable to give up eating meat to decelerate or, possibly, prevent the transition to large-scale operations, which is certain to produce intense suffering if the prevailing attitudes and practices towards farmed animals remain unchanged.
  • If a significant amount of people adopt a vegetarian or vegan diet before intensive livestock farming becomes widespread, and farmed animal production drops as a result, some positive animal lives might be prevented from coming into existence. However, this reduction in animal production would also possibly prevent the much larger number of negative lives that would have come into existence on future factory farms.
  • Even if animal lives on small farms are net positive, they are unlikely to be particularly fulfilling. Adopting a vegetarian or vegan diet can be a strong form of protest against speciesism – unjustified treatment based on species membership. This attitude can be widely observed, and manifests itself in acts such as painful and unnecessarily-prolonged ritual slaughter as well as other ways in which the animals are kept and handled on farms, both large and small.
  • Another consideration is greenhouse gas emissions. Ruminant animals such as cows and sheep are major contributors.
  • Unsanitary and crammed conditions on animal farms lead to the spread of zoonotic diseases, while the large amount of antibiotics that are fed to the animals causes antibiotic resistance. An article in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases concludes, “Intensive livestock farming in Pakistan is consuming alarmingly high amount of antimicrobials critical for human healthcare.”
  • Given these factors and the fact that the consumption of animal products is, strictly speaking, unnecessary, it is ethically imperative to adopt a vegetarian or, even better, vegan diet.